Re: trigger question
От | mikeo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: trigger question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000627115009.009629f0@pop.spectrumtelecorp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: trigger question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
At 11:27 AM 6/27/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >mikeo <mikeo@spectrumtelecorp.com> writes: >> in oracle, the triggers were smart enough to know not to reference >> an old value on insert in an "insert or update" trigger procedure, >> apparently. > >> this is the original oracle trigger that works fine >> with the same insert statement: > >> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER rates_hist_trigger >> before insert or update on rates >> for each row >> WHEN (old.rt_valid <> 'P' or new.rt_valid not in ('Y','N')) > >Hmm. It sounds to me like Oracle treats the OLD fields as being NULL >if the context is INSERT, which is something we could certainly do at >the price of losing some error detection capability --- ie, if that >really had been a typo as I first thought, the system wouldn't flag it >for you. > >Not sure which way is better. Comments anyone? > > regards, tom lane > it would make the insert or update trigger more flexible, and , truly by an insert or update procedure, IMHO :), but is definitely not a priority. creating a rule for each is just as quick as writing a function with a trigger to call it. mikeo
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: