Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000504074216.00f43a90@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? ) (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:26 PM 5/4/00 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: >From what I've read, the extra cache in the PII/III gives you a 5% >boost over the Celeron (I'll guess more for some server apps). For a db server the 100Mhz memory bus of the PII/III probably wins more than 5% over the 66Mhz memory bus of the Celeron. This assumes you're database is reasonably big. Lots of memory transfers going on... >Intel >still sells the Xeon chips, which have a cache twice as big as the >PII/III, but I'm not sure the clock has kept pace and it was always >overpriced wrt performance. Katmai Xeons come with cache size ranging from 512K (the same as a PII/PIII Katmai) to 2MB. That cache, though, is FULL SPEED. Gets you about 10% over a PII/III Katmai for server-type benchmarks I've seen. But they're expensive. You can also go 4-way SMP with them, vs. 2-way with PII/III... Now the new Coppermines have changed things...the Xeon Cu and PII/III Cu both have identical 256K full-speed cache. There's not much reason to buy the Xeon unless you want 4-way SMP, and Intel recognizes this apparently because the price is only 10% higher for these new parts. >Not that anyone asked, but imho the best price/performance x86 machine >has always been a dual processor box one or two clock jumps behind the >fastest available. That's what I did, a dual PII450. I bought them (boxed, fan) for $180 each when PIII450s were $250 or so and PIII 500Es $299 (I bought one of the latter for a home workstation). So it's a PII without the latest matrix instructions for graphics? How many games will I run on my web/db server? :) >You get ~80% more performance for ~5% more cost >than a uniprocessor at the fastest speed. I haven't looked recently to >see if there are now uniprocessor machines at the low end that can >beat the price/performance of the dual-processor setup. The Athlons do, actually ... but I wouldn't trust the mobos for a remote server at this point, not until they're proven stable. They're tricky to build and finicky about power supplies. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: