interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000223081725.010c5c90@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
We've already seen how column alias were breaking pg_dump's ability to restore views unless a table alias were created, fixed now thanks to Tom's hack. Here's an observation that's not really a bug report but which is proving to be an annoyance. The creation of column aliases for tables referenced by views causes the rule created on the underlying virtual table to be in some cases considerably longer than the corresponding rule in V6.5. In practice, this means that several of the views used in the web toolkit I'm porting no longer can be created. In some cases, the views had changed and I'd assumed that this was the cause, but now I'm seeing it in a module (ecommerce) that as yet has not been ported. I'd ported the data model to 6.5 with no problem, but the views can't be created in 7.0. I just tried this yesterday, when I decided to put some effort into porting the module (it contains about 2000 lines of PL/SQL which need to be re-written in PL/pgSQL so it's not entirely a trivial task to move it over). Seeing that these views - which hadn't changed - and in light of the column alias vs. pg_dump issue, I realized that the rule strings are just getting much longer. (The error I'm getting is that the tuple size is too long) Of course, TOAST will solve the problem, but we don't have TOAST yet. I'm assuming Thomas put this in as part of the 'outer join' work. In my case, I recompiled PG with a blocksize of 16KB rather than 8KB, which I've been intending to do anyway for the time being since the 8KB blocksize causes other limitations on the size of text vars, i.e. the discussion forum table is limited to about 6KB chars for the message text when the blocksize is 8KB, really too small. With TOAST coming in 7.1, I'm sticking with "text" rather than segmenting messages into a series of rows and kludging a "solution" by compiling with a 16KB blocksize. This "fixed" my problem with views, too. But I thought I'd share my experience with the group. I don't know how many folks use views in complex ways, but if many do quite a few of them will run into the same problem and we'll probably hear about it. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: