Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000222065543.010a4ec0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? (Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:34 AM 2/22/00 -0600, Ed Loehr wrote: >Can anyone point me to a written description of the expected >functionality (and maybe limitations) provided by this release of RI? >I'm not asking for a definition of RI, but rather the status of >*current* (7.0) pgsql RI functionality, i.e., what one should >expect... Jan was working on docs, and I think maybe Stephan Szabo? But Jan seems to have dropped out of site, again - total immersion at work is my diagnosis. I actually enjoy doing documentation but I'm swamped at the moment, too. In short...if you read Date's SQL primer, all foreign key functionality is there EXCEPT "MATCH PARTIAL" and the check on the target columns being constrained UNIQUE or PRIMARY KEY. We also need to assign a unique name to the foreign key constraint if you don't give one (right now they're just listed "unnamed") because otherwise you don't know which of several foreign key constraints failed unless you explicitly name them yourself. (I forgot that one in my previous note). - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: