Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000221092823.010a4ac0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:41 AM 2/21/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: >> Not having heard anything otherwise, assume we can go Beta today, as >> planned? > >Might as well --- we have open issues, but there'll always be open >issues. I don't think anyone is still hoping to shoehorn new features >into 7.0, just bug fixes. (Wait, does a unary-minus operator for >numeric count as a new feature ;-) ?) I've been using a snapshot taken a couple of days ago, which includes the new datetime stuff and outer join syntax stuff. I've loaded several thousand lines of data model which has been ported from Oracle into it, and have been testing our port of the Ars Digita web toolkit extensively on it. This consists of literally thousands of queries against the aforementioned data model, which includes nearly 500 foreign keys including some "on delete/update cascade" and "set null" clauses. It is all working GREAT. Better than 6.5 (in which case the referential actions have to be removed anyway, of course), in fact. I've had no problems with the new datetime stuff, which was of particular concern to me because the toolkit is full of queries to grab information from the last week, since your last visit to the website, to update robot detection tables, to send e-mail alerts to folks who request them daily or weekly (similar to majordomo digests), to update the database's view of the site's static content, to build reports on usage of the site, etc etc. Certain bug fixes really make the port work cleaner, the "group by" fix (to return no rows if no groups exist) in particular. Even pg_dump works, though I had to modify a couple of views in order to get them reload correctly. If I sound like I was a bit nervous of pg_dump it has to do with those nearly 500 foreign keys I mentioned. Anyway, from my POV it sure feels like it should be a very solid beta. I've not run across anything causing me to want to switch back to 6.5. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: