Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Don Baccus
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Дата
Msg-id 3.0.1.32.20000214165448.01737ec0@mail.pacifier.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Solution for LIMIT cost estimation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
At 10:30 AM 2/15/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote:

>It's a logical fact that the existance of "offset", automatically
>implies
>ordering, no matter how many SQL textbooks you quote.

Chris, that is your opinion and judging from the responses of other
folks on this list, it appears to be very much a minority opinion.

Minority of one, as a matter of fact.  There has been a parade
of posts disagreeing with your opinion.

Why not give up and get on with your life before I get tired of
being polite?  I'm *much* more stubborn than you are, particularly
when I'm right.




- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Следующее
От: Don Baccus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation