Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000213152912.010daa30@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 10:11 AM 2/14/00 +1100, Chris Bitmead wrote: >> Of the standard aggregates, "count()" is probably the only one that >> could make use of it. And of course only rarely is count() used >> in such a way. > >I think a lot of the agregates could make use of it. For example, tell >me all the departments who have spent more than $1000,000 this year... > >select deptid, sum(amount) > 1000000 from purchases group by deptid; This would be harder, because you could only guarantee that sum is of all positive or negative numbers if the user provides a constraint. >> As someone who has long made his living implementing optimizing >> compilers, I don't think that optimizing expressions such as the >> one Chris mentions is all that difficult a task. >> >> But there are far more important things to think about implementing >> in Postgres. > >Yep. Good, because I was about to repeat myself :) - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: