Re: [HACKERS] Copyright
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Copyright |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000129070058.00ed58f0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Copyright (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 05:50 PM 1/29/00 +1100, Philip Warner wrote: >>There's an explicit permission to publish when you mail in your letter >>to the editor. If you were to sue, the court would have a couple of >>questions: >Again, there is an implied license for a one-off usage, but no loss of >copyright. They could not publish my collected letters in a book without >obtaining further permission. It's debatable, at least here in the US. You could look into recent fights among photographers and publishers over web redistribution of articles originally published with ink on paper, for instance. The issue isn't loss of copyright, but license scope... - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: