Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000125151022.00f8c4c0@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 06:01 PM 1/25/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> writes: >>> In particular, if parsetrees for stored rules and constraints worked >>> that way, renumbering attributes that follow the added/dropped column >>> would become a lot less painful. > >> Yes...I see what you're driving at. Very interesting idea. The stored >> rules and constraints would in this case would still refer to the remaining >> columns after a drop, right? > >Right. You'd still need to scan through all the rules/constraints to >look for references to a column-to-be-dropped (and then either drop that >rule/constraint or kick out an error, as appropriate). But you wouldn't >have to *change* any surviving rules/constraints, because they'd still >be referring to the same permanent IDs of the remaining columns. Good, I understand then. >Also, inherited ADD COLUMN would become far easier, because it wouldn't >change the rules/constraints of child tables at all --- even though the >new column would change the logical numbering of child-table columns, >it wouldn't change their permanent IDs and thus we wouldn't have to >update rules/constraints. Ahhh...yes. I haven't looked at the inheritance code, yet, but I see what you're saying. I think. Do child-table columns follow parent-table columns by some chance (in today's absolute column number scheme)? >If we were willing to hardwire the assumption that DROP COLUMN never >physically drops a column, but only hides it and adjusts logical column >numbers, then the physical column numbers could serve as permanent IDs; >so we'd only need two numbers not three. This might be good, or not. Yes. But if I'm right about how child-table columns are numbered, wouldn't add column still cause a problem, i.e. you'd still have to change their physical column number? I'm probably misunderstanding here because I've not looked at the inheritance mechanism at all. Maybe I'll do that for a little evening entertainment. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: