Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.20000107133552.00ee2b44@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 12:00 AM 1/7/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: >On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > select ... >> > from t1 inner join t4 on t1.x=t4.x, >> > t2 left outer join t1 >> > on t2.y=t1.y and >> > (t1.start_date between t2.start_date and t1.start_date), >> > t3 left outer join t1 on t3.x=t1.x and t3.y = t1.y; >> >> Let's be honest, folks. This is almost unreadable. I think we will >> need some simpler way to access _outer_ in addition to the ANSI way. Well...it took a minute to digest the Oracle version, too. Most joins are far simpler than the example. >How do the "books" talk about JOINs? What is the semi-standard syntax >that is generally used in samples? "SQL for smarties" gives examples of vendor-specific syntax then talks about outer joins more abstractly. It also points out that the existing vendor solutions have weaknesses. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: