Re: [INTERFACES] firewall crashes backend
От | Ken J. Wright |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] firewall crashes backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.19990908153940.00960e20@ori-ind.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] firewall crashes backend (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] firewall crashes backend
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
At 18:09 09/08/1999 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >"Ken J. Wright" <ken@ori-ind.com> writes: >> When connecting to postgresql 6.5.1 through a socks5 firewall via ODBC, the >> following error occurs: > >> ERROR: postmaster: StreamConnection: accept: No route to host > >> Then the backend crashes. > >I think you mean the postmaster crashes? Yes I did mean postmaster, however you just gave me absolute definition between the postmaster & a backend postgres ;-) > >> Although the firewall is probably causing the routing trouble, it seems a >> bit extreme for the backend to crash! > >I agree. This looks like a context problem: the StreamConnection >routine is calling elog() to report the error --- but elog expects >to be inside a running backend, not the postmaster process. Trying >to send to the client is no good, and trying to longjmp back to the >backend execution loop is even less good :-( > >StreamConnection should probably just use perror to report the error >on stderr. There's no hope of telling the client about it... Tom, this raises a question. I never really know whether reporting these errors via the interfaces list is adequate to get the fix in a future snapshot or full release. Should I submit an official bug report, or is this good enough to enter the pipeline? And how might I get confirmation on a fix. I don't follow the cvs, but probably there is a change log there? Even the listed changes/fixes for the full/patch releases are a bit terse and sometimes difficult to know if the listed fixes have cured a problem. Ken
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: