Re: [HACKERS] Threads
От | Don Baccus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Threads |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3.0.1.32.19990804042030.00b0f3bc@mail.pacifier.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Threads (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At 07:56 PM 8/3/99 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: >Tom Lane wrote: >> PQconnectdb() is the function that's not thread-safe; if you had >> multiple threads invoking PQconnectdb() in parallel you would see a >> problem. PQconndefaults() is the function that creates an API problem, >> because it exposes the static variable that PQconnectdb() ought not have >> had in the first place. >> >> There might be some other problems too, but that's the main one I'm >> aware of. If we didn't mind breaking existing apps that use >> PQconndefaults(), it would be straightforward to fix... > >Oh, this is interesting. I've been pointer and thread chasing for the >last few hours trying to figure out why AOLserver (a multithreaded open >source web server that supports pooled database (inluding postgresql) >connections) doesn't hit this snag -- and I haven't yet found the >answer... AOLserver rarely does a connect once the server gets fired up and receives traffic. It may be that actual db connects are guarded by semaphores or the like. It may be that conflicts are rare because on a busy site a connection will be made once and only once and later lives on in the pool forever, with the handle being allocated and released by individual .tcl scripts and .adp pages. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: