Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

At 12:22 PM 6/6/99 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>By the way, may I ask more question regarding Oracle? You mentioned
>the magic of no-fsync in Oracle is actually a bug. Ok, I understand. I
>also heard that Oracle does some kind of redo-log bufferings. Does
>this mean certain committed data might be lost if the system crashed
>before the buffered data is written into the disk?

Not sure, actually, I'm by no means an Oracle expert, I was just
passing alone information gleaned from the Oracle/linux newsgroup.
You can access this via the main Oracle website, go to the Oracle
Technology Network and register, much as you did to download your
developer's copy of the db engine.  Some very experienced Oracle
types hang out there.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net