Re: RFD
От | Mike Cox |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2v0ibhF2dsc92U1@uni-berlin.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Bruno Wolff III wrote: > >> I saw a post indicating a request for discussion on the creation of an >> official big 8 newsgroup comp.databases.postgresql.general. According to >> the notice this newsgroup already exists in google groups and is actively >> being used. The discussion will be in news.groups. > I would like to point out that it is NOT creating a different group. It will still be the same, and there will not be a split or anything. What will happen is that the postgresql group will become legitimate, and therefore all usenet servers will carry the group. So this is a process that should have happened when the comp.databases.postresql.* usenet groups were originally created. I'm seeing a lot of support for this, except for one person (who seems to not like me personally). I would welcome people to read through news.groups and follow the postgresql threads. P.S. I am just posting this so people can review the RFD (request for discussion) and please post any suggestions on improvements/likes/dislikes so it can be made better. As not to distract the discussions away from the normal topic, I will post to the postgresql groups no more than once per week until it is time for the call for votes (CFV).
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: