Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2f765a90-5ae4-e533-43e8-407b587895b2@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-10-13 00:43, David G. Johnston wrote: > Over in Bug# 16652 [1] Christoph failed to recognize the fact that > signal sending functions are inherently one-way just as signals are. It > seems worth heading off this situation in the future by making it clear > how signals behave and, in the specific case of pg_reload_conf, that the > important feedback one would hope to get out of a success/failure > response from the function call must instead be found in other locations. I agree that the documentation could be improved here. But I don't see how the added advice actually helps in practice. How can you detect reload errors by inspecting pg_settings etc.? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: