Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
От | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2f4958ff0812261257x482f30a7y80345bed8a4e090b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: lack of consequence with domains and types ("Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: lack of consequence with domains and types
|
Список | pgsql-general |
another glance at source code, and docs tells me - that there's not such thing as default value for custom type - unless that type is defined as new base scalar type. So probably, that would require postgresql to allow users to define default values for composite types as well, like that: create type foo AS ( a int default 1, b foodomain default 'foo', .... ); Going through source code, I have no idea where that would go - because I got only experience in creating types + custom indices, not hacking postgresql guts. More help required here, please .. (I don't know, should that go to -hackers [too]. My recent history there probably makes majority of folks to ignore my posts straight away). Thanks.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: