Re: serial
От | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: serial |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2f4958ff0812050142u21a34f6dodb4411bf80579c2d@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: serial (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote: > Scott Marlowe, 04.12.2008 16:34: >> >> Like an Oracle DBA who told me >> pgsql was broken because the output of group by wasn't properly >> ordered like it was on Oracle 9. > > Then he did not know Oracle very well :) > Even Oracle 9 does not guarantee that the output of an GROUP BY is actually > sorted, with Oracle 10 this has just gotton more "obvious" because the > grouping strategies were enhanced. > yeah, that sounds merely like his short experience, or by-product of the way GROUP BY was implemented in some particular version of oracle 9, not a guaranteed outcome. Poor guy... he probably still lives on thinking that oracle is so good because of those little 'things' :) -- GJ
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: