Re: visibility maps
От | Pavan Deolasee |
---|---|
Тема | Re: visibility maps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2e78013d0812170557u67a5894aua27bb5476f02e9dd@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: visibility maps (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: visibility maps
Re: visibility maps |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > I think what you are suggesting is that we should set the visibility map > bit while dead line pointers (tombstones) still remain. If that's what > you meant it's a bad idea. No, I'm not suggesting that. I understand the problem there. I was merely explaining how HOT-prune may some time (when there are no DEAD line pointers created) help us set the visibility bit early. OTOH I think we can still set PD_ALL_VISIBLE page header flag even when there are DEAD line pointers. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: