Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB
От | Pavan Deolasee |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2e78013d0804210540i4d2efb39v51d309394227dd47@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regression test fails when BLCKSZ is 1kB
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > > For previously established reasons, we don't want to add ORDER BY clauses to > every test that might fail under exceptional circumstances so we test all > plan types equally. I think very small block sizes are fairly exceptional, > unless you have a reason up your sleeve why they are a good idea. > Now that we have autovacuum on by default, we might get into random failures because of re-ordering. Though I don't seem to recall anybody complaining yet, it could just be that we are lucky or our regression suite don't have long enough running tests to give autovacuum chance to recycle some of the dead tuples. Thanks, Pavan -- Pavan Deolasee EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: