Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От torikoshia
Тема Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall
Дата
Msg-id 2e75ae22dce9a227c3d47fa6d0ed094a@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall  (Polina Bungina <bungina@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_rewind WAL segments deletion pitfall  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2022-09-29 17:18, Polina Bungina wrote:
> I agree with your suggestions, so here is the updated version of
> patch. Hope I haven't missed anything.
> 
> Regards,
> Polina Bungina

Thanks for working on this!
It seems like we are also facing the same issue.

I tested the v3 patch under our condition, old primary has succeeded to 
become new standby.


BTW when I used pg_rewind-removes-wal-segments-reproduce.sh attached in 
[1], old primary also failed to become standby:

   FATAL:  could not receive data from WAL stream: ERROR:  requested WAL 
segment 000000020000000000000007 has already been removed

However, I think this is not a problem:  just adding restore_command 
like below fixed the situation.

   echo "restore_command = '/bin/cp `pwd`/newarch/%f %p'" >> 
oldprim/postgresql.conf

Attached modified reproduction script for reference.

[1]https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFh8B%3DnNiFZOAPsv49gffxHBPzwmZ%3D6Msd4miMis87K%3Dd9rcRA%40mail.gmail.com


-- 
Regards,

--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Japin Li
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Another incorrect comment for pg_stat_statements
Следующее
От: Alena Rybakina
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MergeJoin beats HashJoin in the case of multiple hash clauses