Re: role self-revocation
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: role self-revocation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2e2f9ae2-50fc-1a03-394c-ed4288a8cae2@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: role self-revocation (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: role self-revocation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.03.22 14:02, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:55 AM Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> Do we have subtractive permissions today? > > Not in the GRANT/REVOKE sense, I think, but you can put a user in a > group and then mention that group in pg_hba.conf. And that line might > be "reject" or whatever. Well, you can always build an external system that looks at roles and does nonsensical things with it. But the privilege system itself seems to be additive only. Personally, I agree with the argument that there should not be any subtractive permissions. The mental model where permissions are sort of keys to doors or boxes just doesn't work for that.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: