Re: Collation versioning
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Collation versioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2df246f1-a1f5-8344-9100-be53736f68c0@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Collation versioning (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Collation versioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-10-09 21:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2019-10-03 14:25, Thomas Munro wrote: >>> The only open question on this patch was whether it's a good version to >>> use. I think based on subsequent discussions, there was the realization >>> that this is the best we can do and better than nothing. >>> >>> In the patch, I would skip the configure test and just do >>> >>> #ifdef __GLIBC__ >>> >>> directly. >> >> Ok. Here's one like that. > > Pushed that. Actually, I had to revert that because pg_dump and pg_upgrade tests need to be updated, but that seems doable. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: