Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2d939fc7-5c13-00e7-590d-5b561e15af47@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/5/20 10:02 AM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > On 5/6/20 5:19 μ.μ., Thomas Kellerer wrote: >> Achilleas Mantzios schrieb am 05.06.2020 um 14:05: >>>> Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part >>>> name, something >>>> sqlserver excels at. >>> Maybe because SQL server does not have real databases but schemas instead ? >>> This sucks security wise. >> That is wrong. >> >> SQL Server has both: databases and schemas and it allows for standard >> compliant catalog.schema.table references. >> >> I think you are confusing that with MySQL where a schema and a database >> are the same thing > I think that you are confusing what you think I am confusing. I am talking > about our MS SQL installation here at work. Not done by me anyways I am > the pgsql guy, but still do most of the query stuff in ms sql as well. > I wrote already that my comment was far fetched in a subsequent email. I manage SQL Server instances with multiple databases, each with multiple schemas. -- Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: