Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
| От | Sokolov Yura |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2c9d606592566b7adcbec822ad31b730@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-08-30 16:24, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> It doesn't seems to make sense to consider this patch unless we get >> access >> to suitable Power machine to reproduce benefits. >> This is why I'm going to mark this patch "Returned with feedback". >> Once we would get access to the appropriate machine, I will resubmit >> this >> patch. > > What about hydra (that 60-core POWER7 machine we have community > access to)? > > regards, tom lane Anyway, I encourage to consider first another LWLock patch: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/1166/ It positively affects performance on any platform (I've tested it on Power as well). And I have prototype of further adaptation of that patch for POWER platform (ie using inline assembly) (not published yet). -- Sokolov Yura Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.ru The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: