Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2c8e3085-7eae-8666-5a3a-fd1e44bc8ed3@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-08-29 Mo 09:35, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 8/29/22 8:56 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 5:11 AM Nikita Glukhov >> <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> I am not sure if it's OK to eval_const_expressions() on a Query >> sub-expression during parse-analysis. IIUC, it is only correct to >> apply it to after the rewriting phase. >> >>> Maybe it would be better to simply remove DEFAULT ON EMPTY. >> >> So +1 to this for now. > > +1, if this simplifies the patch and makes it acceptable for v15 > >>> It is possible to easily split this patch into several subpatches, >>> I will do it if needed. >> >> That would be nice indeed. > > With RMT hat on, the RMT has its weekly meetings on Tuesdays. Based on > the timing of the Beta 4 commit freeze[1] and how both > including/reverting are nontrivial operations (e.g. we should ensure > we're confident in both and that they pass through the buildfarm), we > are going to have to make a decision on how to proceed at the next > meeting. > > Can folks please chime in on what they think of the current patchset > and if this is acceptable for v15? > > I think at a pinch we could probably go with it, but it's a close call. I think it deals with the most pressing issues that have been raised. If people are still worried I think it would be trivial to add in calls that error out of the DEFAULT clauses are used at all. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: