Re: pgsql: Remove IS_AF_UNIX macro
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Remove IS_AF_UNIX macro |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2c53ab2c-e14d-eb00-554e-5520bdbc8d3c@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Remove IS_AF_UNIX macro (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Remove IS_AF_UNIX macro
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 15.02.22 16:41, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: >> Remove IS_AF_UNIX macro >> The AF_UNIX macro was being used unprotected by HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS, >> apparently since 2008. > > I hadn't looked closely at this patch, but are you referring to > this bit in ip.h? > > #ifdef HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS > #define IS_AF_UNIX(fam) ((fam) == AF_UNIX) > #else > #define IS_AF_UNIX(fam) (0) > #endif > > That's by no means "unprotected": we will not try to reference > AF_UNIX unless HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS is set. In src/backend/utils/adt/pgstatfuncs.c there is a use of AF_UNIX that has been there unprotected by any #ifdef since about 2008. > We might as well just nuke > all the HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS conditional compilation if we let > this stand. > > (Now, maybe we should indeed do that. I don't have much > interest in the possibility that we'll worry about such > platforms in future.) Maybe/probably. But there is a difference between platforms having the AF_UNIX symbol (which is required by POSIX unconditionally) and platforms actually having Unix sockets or not (which might require different default configurations or run-time behavior), so the two questions are not that closely connected.
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: