Re: Postgres advice for Java/Hibernate project
От | Damian C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres advice for Java/Hibernate project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2bbc8f530606181942k50ae377ue943791ae0c0f83b@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres advice for Java/Hibernate project (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Many thanks to Richard, John and Tom for your replies. Our way forward on these issues is now clear. (1) Hibernate converts our Java Strings to SQL/Postgres "varchar" defaulting to length 256 if we don't specify anything (currently we always do specify). We now have a basis to chose a way forward. (2) The "binary boundry length" always seemed to be a "furfie" - and that is reinforced by your comments. On a separate issue I would like to point out that we have spent nearly 18 months developing this product and we have prototypes operating successfully in industry, and this has been our first post to the Postgres forum!!! I think it is a credit to the Postgres product and community that it can be deployed so successfully with so little specialist knowledge. No doubt there are many improvements that we could make, but to date it has been a pleasure for us members of "the great unwashed" to work with. Many thanks, -Damian
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: