Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2b6890db-acca-8f44-de4f-f43d70d57000@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/21/19 1:49 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:41:32AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>> Can someone describe a scenario where this (name of the binary not >>> clearly indicating it's related postgres) causes issues in practice? On >>> my system, there are ~1400 binaries in /usr/bin, and for the vast >>> majority of them it's rather unclear where do they come from. > > Naming conflict because our binary names are too generic? createdb > could for example be applied to any database, and not only Postgres. > (I have 1600 entries in /usr/bin on a Debian installation.) > Maybe. Do we actually know about such cases? Also, isn't setting --prefix a suitable solution? I mean, it's what we/packagers do to support installing multiple Pg versions (in which case it'll conflict no matter how we rename stuff) anyway. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: