Re: Auto-vectorization speeds up multiplication of large-precisionnumerics
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Auto-vectorization speeds up multiplication of large-precisionnumerics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2b619caf-7f88-fb4c-43ff-ef337d667ff3@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Auto-vectorization speeds up multiplication of large-precision numerics (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Auto-vectorization speeds up multiplication of large-precision numerics
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-06-09 13:50, Amit Khandekar wrote: > Also, the regress/sql/numeric_big test itself speeds up by 80% That's nice. I can confirm the speedup: -O3 without the patch: numeric ... ok 737 ms test numeric_big ... ok 1014 ms -O3 with the patch: numeric ... ok 680 ms test numeric_big ... ok 580 ms Also: -O2 without the patch: numeric ... ok 693 ms test numeric_big ... ok 1160 ms -O2 with the patch: numeric ... ok 677 ms test numeric_big ... ok 917 ms So the patch helps either way. But it also seems that without the patch, -O3 might be a bit slower in some cases. This might need more testing. > For the for loop to be auto-vectorized, I had to simplify it to > something like this : Well, how do we make sure we keep it that way? How do we prevent some random rearranging of the code or some random compiler change to break this again? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: