Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Дата
Msg-id 2b2f97d5-b2e9-564e-ea71-96dd62799e47@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 06.02.23 16:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I recently moved crake to a new machine running Fedora 36, which has 
> OpenSSL 3.0.0. This causes the SSL tests to fail on branches earlier 
> than release 13, so I propose to backpatch commit f0d2c65f17 to the 
> release 11 and 12 branches.

This is not the only patch that we did to support OpenSSL 3.0.0.  There 
was a very lengthy discussion that resulted in various patches.  Unless 
we have a complete analysis of what was done and how it affects various 
branches, I would not do this.  Notably, we did actually consider what 
to backpatch, and the current state is the result of that.  So let's not 
throw that away without considering that carefully.  Even if it gets it 
to compile, I personally would not *trust* it without that analysis.  I 
think we should just leave it alone and consider OpenSSL 3.0.0 
unsupported in the branches were it is now unsupported.  OpenSSL 1.1.1 
is still supported upstream to serve those releases.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Следующее
От: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication