Re: Refactoring SSL tests
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refactoring SSL tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2ac2a9c7-7cc5-a52d-6556-3d698cf84009@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Refactoring SSL tests (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Refactoring SSL tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/2/22 14:50, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 2 Feb 2022, at 17:09, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> On 2/2/22 08:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> Thoughts? I'm fairly sure there are many crimes against Perl in this patch, >>> I'm happy to take pointers on how to improve that. >> It feels a bit odd to me from a perl POV. I think it needs to more along >> the lines of standard OO patterns. I'll take a stab at that based on >> this, might be a few days. > That would be great, thanks! > Here's the result of that surgery. It's a little incomplete in that it needs some POD adjustment, but I think the code is right - it passes testing for me. One of the advantages of this, apart from being more idiomatic, is that by avoiding the use of package level variables you can have two SSL::Server objects, one for OpenSSL and (eventually) one for NSS. This was the original motivation for the recent install_path additions to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster, so it complements that work nicely. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: