Re: [PATCHES] Dynamic Tracing docs

On Dec 1, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> This includes refactoring of some of the trace related GUC docs from
>> config.sgml, so its all in the one place.
>
> Why exactly is that a good idea?  Since DTrace is Solaris-only, this
> almost seems like an attempt to hide non-Solaris-specific information
> where people won't look for it.  Moreover, the point of config.sgml
> is to describe all the configuration parameters in one place.  We
> do not
> need to have people second-guessing that decision for random subsets
> of the parameters.

There is high likelihood that DTrace will be present in FreeBSD 7.0
and Mac OS 10.5.  So, 3 of the support platforms would make use of it.

// Theo Schlossnagle
// CTO -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/