Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
| От | Scott Lamb |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2F466580-6F69-11D7-84B1-000393D581B8@slamb.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tuesday, Apr 15, 2003, at 12:35 US/Central, Josh Berkus wrote: > Nor does your suggestion solve the problem of how to get the documents > on the > web page if the submitter doesn't have CVS access .... I'm not sure I understand the CVS requirement as a big problem. I see people not wanting CVS for two reasons: - Requiring submitters to understand CVS. But honestly, I'm not sure about the quality of any tech document written by someone who doesn't. - Requiring submitters to have a CVS account. I've contributed via CVS to many projects at which I have no account. I make a patch file and send it to someone who does. I don't think that creates much more work for me or them. Scott
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: