Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
| От | Daniel Gustafsson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2EEB2314-2DA8-489E-B10B-ADADAC2BF000@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 4 Apr 2024, at 00:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> On 3 Apr 2024, at 19:38, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Bottom line for me is that pulling 1.0.1 support now is OK, >>> but I think pulling 1.0.2 is premature. > >> Is Red Hat building and and shipping v17 packages for RHEL7 ELS customers? If >> not then it seems mostly academical to tie our dependencies to RHEL ELS unless >> I'm missing something. > > True, they won't be doing that, and neither will Devrim. So maybe > we can leave RHEL7 out of the discussion, in which case there's > not a lot of reason to keep 1.0.2 support. We'll need to notify > buildfarm owners to adjust their configurations. The patch will also need to be adjusted to work with LibreSSL, but I know Jacob was looking into that so ideally we should have something to review before the weekend. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: