Re: Allow tests to pass in OpenSSL FIPS mode

> On 6 Mar 2023, at 15:55, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:

>> For readers without all context, wouldn't it be better to encode in the
>> function name why we're not just calling a hash like md5?  Something like
>> fips_allowed_hash() or similar?
> 
> I'd prefer shorter than that --- all these queries are laid out on the
> expectation of a very short function name.  Maybe "fipshash()"?
> 
> We could make the comment introducing the function declarations more
> elaborate, too.

fipshash() with an explanatory comments sounds like a good idea.

--
Daniel Gustafsson