Re: DSO Terms Galore
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DSO Terms Galore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2D2998B3-4C8B-4EB5-8477-708E12A22EFE@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DSO Terms Galore (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 23, 2024, at 07:26, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > Things like "object" or "object file" or probably wrong-ish. I understand an object file to be a .o file, which you can'tdlopen directly. Agreed. Another option, however, is “dynamically shared object” (DSO), which corresponds to the usual *nix extension, .so. I thinkI know the term most from Apache. It’s curious that I didn’t run across it while perusing the Postgres docs. > I think we can unify this around terms like "dynamically loadable library" and "dynamically loadable module" (or "loaded"in cases where it's talking about a file that has already been loaded). +1 for “dynamically loadable module” and, in common usage, “module”, since I don’t think it would be confused for anythingelse. “dynamically loadable library” would either have to always be used in full --- because “library” can be static,too --- or to “DLL”, which has strong Windows associations. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: