Re: data=writeback
От | Priem, Alexander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: data=writeback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2A07EC2D0BC2774AAD6F74769F60D52A0832C8@ahmose.cict_ad.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | data=writeback ("Priem, Alexander" <ap@cict.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: data=writeback
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
> > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql ext3 > > noatime,data=writeback 1 2 > > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql/wal ext3 > > noatime,data=ordered 1 2 > > The same label mounted on two different mount points is probably I typo? No, the same label mounted on two different mount points is not a typo. This is the way it is in my /etc/fstab. Note that I did not create this file myself, it was created by the RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 ES installer. I created different partitions for the data directory (/usr/local/pgsql) and the wal directory (/usr/local/pgsql/wal) using the installer and this is how the /etc/fstab file ended up. Why, is this bad? They use the same label, but use different mount points? Can this cause problems?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: