On 28.02.23 11:19, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> +1 for the changes.
>
> >1. Why is "wanted >=%u" any better than "wanted at least %u"? IMO, the
> >wording as opposed to >= symbol in the user-facing messages works
> >better.
>
> I think I agree with Bharath on this: "wanted at least %u" sounds better
> for user error than "wanted >=%u".
I committed this with "at least", as suggested, and also changed
"wanted" to "expected", which matches the usual error message style better.