Re: Unused header file inclusion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unused header file inclusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29998.1565029503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unused header file inclusion (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unused header file inclusion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Then there's the <limits.h> removal, which is in tuplesort.c because of > INT_MAX as added by commit d26559dbf356 and still present ... One has to be especially wary of removing system-header inclusions; the fact that they don't seem to be needed on your own machine doesn't prove they aren't needed elsewhere. > ... I suggest this patch should be rejected. Yeah. If we do anything along this line it should be based on pgrminclude results, and even then I think it'd require manual review, especially for changes in header files. The big picture here is that removing #includes is seldom worth the effort it takes :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: