Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29994.1067273042@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails
Re: pg_ctl reports succes when start fails |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > We can also try to come up with a better scheme for verifying that we > have started properly - I will think about that. There have been previous suggestions for a "pg_ping" functionality, in which you could simply send a packet to the postmaster and it would answer back if it's open for business. You can approximate this by sending a deliberately invalid login packet, but it's not quite the same thing. I think there were some concerns about security though; check the archives. In any case, a C-code pg_ctl could eliminate most of the problems directly, simply because it wouldn't have to rely on psql. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: