Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
Дата
Msg-id 29976.1299289772@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org> writes:
> ITYM plperl only, because plpython does not have a trusted variant. But
> there might be another obstacle here: plpython comes in two variants:
> plpython2u and plpython3u, and which one is built depends on the compile
> time configuration. Not sure how that plays with extensions...

Sorry, you're right, that issue is actually plpythonu and plpython2u
sharing the same handler.  It's basically the same problem though.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jan Urbański
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)