Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29935.1256222015@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected) (Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected)
Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected) Re: Problem with return type of function ??? (corrected) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Denis BUCHER <dbucherml@hsolutions.ch> writes: > I have a strange problem, because it worked in a fonction for a table, > and now I created the same (?) function for another table and it doesn't > work... > The function is accepted but at runtime I get : > ERREUR: wrong record type supplied in RETURN NEXT > CONTEXTE : PL/pgSQL function "find_sn_live" line 26 at return next Does that table have any dropped columns? If you don't remember whether you ever dropped any columns, a quick look into pg_attribute will tell you: select attname from pg_attribute where attrelid = 'rma.serial_number'::regclass; plpgsql isn't tremendously good with rowtypes that contain dropped columns. I believe this particular case is fixed in CVS HEAD, but the patch was a bit invasive and won't get back-ported to existing releases. The workaround is to drop and recreate the table without any dropped columns. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: