Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I think he is creating his own shared memory area:
Oh, I see. Isn't that pretty silly, considering that there's no way
for such objects to share a DBconnection if they are in different
application processes? Seems like a simple static variable would do
the job just as well with a lot fewer portability and resource-leakage
issues...
regards, tom lane