Re: Crash dumps
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Crash dumps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29881.1310048548@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Crash dumps (Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Radosław Smogura <rsmogura@softperience.eu> writes: > Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> Thursday 07 of July 2011 01:05:48 >> How do you propose to make that reliable, though? > I want to add IPC layer to postgresql, few approches may be considerable, > 1. System IPC > 2. Urgent data on socket > 3. Sockets (at least descriptors) + threads > 4. Not portable, fork in segfault (I think forked process should start in > segfault too). An IPC layer to be invoked during segfaults? Somehow I don't think that's going to pass the reliability threshold. It doesn't sound promising from a portability standpoint either, since not one of your suggestions will work everywhere, even without the already-segfaulted context to worry about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: