Re: Poor performance for delete query
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Poor performance for delete query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29874.1398374703@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Poor performance for delete query (Jonatan Evald Buus <jonatan.buus@cellpointmobile.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Poor performance for delete query
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jonatan Evald Buus <jonatan.buus@cellpointmobile.com> writes: > On 24 April 2014 22:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'd really have to bet that you forgot to index one of the referencing >> tables. > *That was our first thought, so we went through the child tables to check > but apparently we missed some. (please see below for the difference in the > explain analyze output)* I'm confused. Your second EXPLAIN ANALYZE looks like you fixed the problem. Are you still thinking there's an issue? > Why is "order2transaction_fk" being triggered twice? Is that because > there're two affected rows? No, I'd have expected a delete of multiple rows to show as calls=N, not N separate entries. Maybe there are recursive queries buried under here somewhere? That is, are you expecting any of the cascaded deletes to cascade further? I don't recall exactly what EXPLAIN is likely to do with such cases. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: