Re: Better error message for unsupported replication cases

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 3:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ...  Maybe the error message
>> could be bikeshedded ... is "non-table relation" terminology
>> that we use in user-facing messages?

> The other option could be "logical replication source relation
> \"%s.%s\" is not a table". We use a similar message in
> CheckSubscriptionRelkind.

Works for me, I'll do it like that if there are no objections.

            regards, tom lane