Re: [HACKERS] Stale porting list?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Stale porting list? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29817.914951962@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Stale porting list? ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-ports |
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > If anyone has news or success on the following ports, please let us/me > know and I'll update the list. Machines which have no reports are likely > to be listed as unsupported for v6.5 :( > SunOS (4.1.4?) > Is non-Solaris SunOS defunct? I tested 6.4 on SunOS 4.1.4 and it more or less worked --- no int8 support, and a number of regression tests show differences traceable to SunOS's atol() failing to report integer overflow. Stephen Kogge has been looking into whether it's possible to get rid of those problems by using pieces of GNU libc, but I dunno whether it's really worth the trouble. I did see a more serious problem, a backend coredump in the "opr_sanity" test. That's been reported on at least one other platform (cf. message from Keith Parks on the hackers list, 14-Dec), so I think it may be an actual portability bug in the 6.4 code. I do not have the time or expertise to track it down though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: