Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 29814.1406155122@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars (Robert Fleming <fleminra@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #11028: psql doesn't use 0x01 and 0x02 to inform
readline of non-printable PROMPT1 chars
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Robert Fleming <fleminra@gmail.com> writes: > Yes, sorry, actually it's using libedit. Is that supported? Ah. We support libedit, but I'd not be a bit surprised if it does not cope well with non-printing characters ... A quick look into the readline.h supplied on my Mac OS X 10.9 machine (which is from libedit not GNU readline) says that it defines RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE and RL_PROMPT_END_IGNORE, so at least in theory you'd expect it to work. A bit of experimentation says that it doesn't work all that well though compared to my Linux box :-(. Now, Apple has a long track record of shipping broken versions of libedit, so this doesn't prove a whole lot about what will happen on other platforms. I'd make sure that PG was compiled against a version of readline.h that provided definitions for RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE and RL_PROMPT_END_IGNORE. If it was, then whatever misbehavior you're seeing can be blamed on libedit. If you're using an old version of libedit it's possible that a newer one would work better. But really, libedit is full of inadequacies; if you can possibly switch to GNU readline you'll probably be happier. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: