Re: Split-up ECPG patches

I wrote:
> The fundamental reason that there's a problem here is that ecpg has
> decided to accept a syntax that the backend doesn't (ie, FETCH with a
> fetch direction but no FROM/IN).  I think that that's basically a bad
> idea: it's not helpful to users to be inconsistent, and it requires ugly
> hacks in ecpg, and now ugly hacks in the core grammar as well.  We
> should resolve it either by taking out that syntax from ecpg, or by
> making the backend accept it too.  Not by uglifying the grammars some
> more in order to keep them inconsistent.

On looking a bit closer at this: I think the reason the core grammar
requires FROM/IN after fetch_direction is to leave the door open for
someday generalizing the fetch count to be an expression, not just an
integer constant.  If we made FROM/IN optional, then doing that would
require some ugly syntax hack or other, such as requiring parentheses
around nontrivial expressions.  So I'd like to see an actual case made
that there's a strong reason for not requiring FROM/IN in ecpg.
        regards, tom lane