Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2976202.1646231744@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset
Re: pg_stop_backup() v2 incorrectly marked as proretset |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 5:25 AM Aleksander Alekseev > <aleksander@timescale.com> wrote: >> Declaring a macro inside the procedure body is a bit unconventional. >> Since it doesn't seem to be used for anything except these two array >> declarations I suggest keeping simply "3" here. > I think we do this kind of thing in various places in similar > situations, and I think it is good style. It makes it easier to catch > everything if you ever need to update the code. Yeah, there's plenty of precedent for that coding if you look around. I've not read the whole patch, but this snippet seems fine to me if there's also an #undef at the end of the function. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: